Should you choose LiveKit Cloud, or self-host?

Choosing between self-hosting LiveKit or using LiveKit Cloud involves weighing control against convenience, as both options provide the same components, APIs, and SDKs with differing operational responsibilities. Self-hosting grants full control over infrastructure but requires managing services, infrastructure, and ongoing operations, which is suitable for teams with robust DevOps processes and predictable traffic patterns. In contrast, LiveKit Cloud offers a managed service that alleviates operational burdens, providing additional features like managed agent hosting, enhanced noise cancellation, and global network capabilities that are not feasible in self-hosted setups. LiveKit Cloud is ideal for teams needing quick deployment, global infrastructure, and advanced telephony capabilities, while self-hosting is preferable for those with specific compliance needs and a preference for fixed costs. The open-source nature of LiveKit ensures flexibility, allowing teams to transition between hosting models as their needs evolve, with both options enabling scalable and reliable voice AI and media routing solutions.

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.