Integrating speech-to-text into your EHR: epic, athenahealth and FHIR
Blog post from Gladia
Integrating speech-to-text with Epic and athenahealth depends less on transcription accuracy than on securely transforming audio outputs into FHIR resources, managing SMART on FHIR or OAuth 2.0 authorization, and operating asynchronous, fault-tolerant pipelines that withstand EHR validation, outages, and rate limits. Full transcripts are generally stored as DocumentReference resources, while extracted observations, medications, diagnoses, and AI summaries can be mapped to Observation, MedicationRequest, Condition, and ClinicalImpression resources, ideally through atomic transaction bundles. Epic integrations often require longer timelines, higher costs, health-system-specific review, and careful handling of encounter status, whereas athenahealth offers both broader proprietary REST APIs and more portable but narrower FHIR endpoints. Recommended operational practices include queue-based writes, exponential backoff, conditional creation and ETag locking to prevent duplicates or conflicts, dead-letter queues for permanent failures, audit logging, encryption, secrets rotation, and production monitoring. The guide also notes that facility-specific controls such as IP allowlists, mutual TLS, or VPNs may be required, and that clinical deployments handling protected health information should use service plans where customer data is not used for model training.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM | 4 | 6,036 | 1,167 | 244 | +15% |
| Real-time | 4 | 4,852 | 1,086 | 241 | +4% |
| Secrets Management | 4 | 2,046 | 504 | 139 | -11% |
| Vector Search | 2 | 1,674 | 383 | 126 | -30% |
| Data Pipeline | 1 | 273 | 146 | 76 | -31% |
| Observability | 1 | 2,762 | 731 | 188 | -15% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.