Choosing Between ClickStack and Grafana for ClickHouse Observability
Blog post from ClickHouse
When leveraging ClickHouse as the primary observability backend, teams face a decision between two main interfaces: ClickStack and Grafana with the ClickHouse plugin. ClickStack is tailored for ClickHouse, offering an investigation-first approach that prioritizes search and pattern recognition across logs, traces, metrics, and sessions, making it ideal for teams focused on investigative workflows. It supports agentic SRE models with tools that simplify SQL-based analysis, enabling engineers to build and manage their own tools and investigations. On the other hand, Grafana provides a cohesive visualization and monitoring interface across various data sources, making it suitable for organizations with heterogeneous technology environments. It integrates ClickHouse data with existing dashboards and alerting systems, offering flexibility despite requiring more explicit configuration. Many organizations opt to use both tools, with Grafana handling cross-system monitoring and ClickStack providing a specialized environment for in-depth telemetry analysis. The choice ultimately depends on the organization's existing infrastructure and workflow preferences, with the flexibility to adapt as needs evolve.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observability | 16 | 3,826 | 727 | 190 | -10% |
| MCP | 7 | 7,781 | 805 | 204 | +0% |
| OpenTelemetry | 3 | 1,041 | 152 | 50 | +7% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.