Anthropic — Compare Product Launches

Compare product launches across companies

Every product starts at Week 1 on its first observed publication date on or after its tracking date, falling back to that tracking date when no data exists. This comparison start is inferred from tracked content.

All includes Blog, X / Twitter, and YouTube. LinkedIn analytics data is only available to paying customers.

Products
Display

Mentions · Cumulative

Normalized data through Oct 5, 2026. Each week spans seven days from that product’s comparison start. Hollow points mark partial weeks; they contain recorded data only.

View week-by-week tables

Product summary

Totals cover the displayed window, including its partial week. Averages, peaks, and latest changes use completed weeks only. Products may have different amounts of completed history.

ProductComparison startCompleted weeksPartial progress MentionsItemsDistinct companiesAvg mentions / completed weekPeak completed weekLatest completed-week change
Opus 5.5 Sep 22, 2026
First observed data
2 — 75414451 377.0 Week 1
506 mentions
-51.0%

Source breakdown

ProductBlogX / TwitterYouTube
MentionsItemsDistinct companiesMentionsItemsDistinct companiesMentionsItemsDistinct companies
Opus 5.5581401997854076198

Week-by-week detail

Opus 5.5
Opus 5.5 · Mentions · Cumulative
Launch weekActual datesStatusMentionsItemsDistinct companiesCumulative mentionsMention growth
Week 1Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026 Completed 50610545506 —
Week 2Sep 29, 2026 – Oct 5, 2026 Completed 2483920754 -51.0%

Recent content

Latest 50 matching items across selected products and their displayed windows. Items mentioning several products appear once.

ContentProductsSourcePublisherDate
RT @bentlegen: I wanted to know how far you can push these vids So I gave Opus 5.5 Blender, ElevenLabs and REAPER (DAW) and asked it to ma…Opus 5.5X / TwitterModemOct 5, 2026
Cloudflare Just Challenged Jev, So I Tested Their New Model (Clef)Opus 5.5YouTubeBetter StackOct 5, 2026
RT @rseroter: Updated @antigravity in my personal Google AI Pro subscription. Well hello Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5. Pretty good value…Opus 5.5X / TwitterGoogle CloudOct 3, 2026
Sales Is Shipping SoftwareOpus 5.5YouTubeReplitOct 3, 2026
The Agent Said It Was Done. The Database Disagreed.Opus 5.5BlogHugging FaceOct 3, 2026
Google announced Gemini 4 Argon on September 30. - Vendor benchmarks: leads DeepSWE v1.1 and the Vals Index. - Artificial Analysis independent score: 52.6 vs 57.6 for Claude Opus 5.5. - Access: Fairwind cyber defenders only. No public API yet. Strong, uneven, and unavailable to most teams. Full breakdown → https://t.co/mODrd9gGL2 #Gemini4 #AIModels #AISecurity #CISOOpus 5.5X / TwitterNeuralTrustOct 2, 2026
This video was made with Claude Opus 5.5 and goes to show what TestMu AI does. Launched by Anthropic on September 22, 2026, Opus 5.5 is what the company calls "the strongest-performing model we've tested to date" built for agentic coding, knowledge work, computer use and multidisciplinary reasoning. You can use Claude Opus 5.5 to build and run video agents that plan, storyboard, edit, and render multimedia content autonomously. 🚀 Major perks of Opus 5.5: - Faster and cheaper to run than Opus 5 - StrongerOpus 5.5X / TwitterTestMu AIOct 2, 2026
Controlling an AI agent at runtime using UnleashOpus 5.5BlogUnleashOct 2, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon Explained: Benchmarks, Pricing, and AccessOpus 5.5BlogTestMu AIOct 2, 2026
Secure Claude for UK Enterprise: Residency and ControlsOpus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustOct 2, 2026
Claude’s hillclimb loop for AI agents: start with production tracesOpus 5.5BlogArizeOct 2, 2026
Prompt caching benchmark: high cache reuse doesn’t always mean lower costOpus 5.5BlogArizeOct 2, 2026
The biggest generational jump since June came from a model that costs $0.18 per million output tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (@Deepseek_AI) scored 26.8 points higher on Toolathlon than the release it replaced. GLM-5.3 gained 24.8 on the same board. Claude Opus 5.5 added 20.7 on SWE-bench Pro, and Claude Sonnet 5.5 added 18.1 there six days later. Scores via https://t.co/sxXugN92FJ, week of Sep 28.Opus 5.5X / TwitterMergeOct 1, 2026
RT @darylginn: Using @paper with Opus 5.5 a lot for design work lately. I don't think I can go back to doing things manually anymore. It's…Opus 5.5X / TwitterPaperOct 1, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 Explained: Faster, Cheaper & Built for AI AgentsOpus 5.5YouTubeTestMu AIOct 1, 2026
Announcing @neon/effectOpus 5.5BlogNeonOct 1, 2026
GPT-6 Sol on Codex: average scores, quarter the costOpus 5.5BlogEndor LabsOct 1, 2026
Gemini 4 Argon: Benchmarks, Pricing & Security (2026)Opus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustOct 1, 2026
The best open-weight model for code is third overall, at a 23rd of the price of the model above it. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 60.9 on SciCode against Claude Opus 5.5's 66.9, and runs $0.87 per million output tokens against $20. Kimi K3 and GLM-5.3 follow within two points of it. Six points for $19 per million tokens is a real tradeoff, and it's the kind a Build-Your-Own-Router policy on Merge Gateway lets you set per request rather than once. Scores via https://t.co/TeTHwS52d4, week of Sep 28.Opus 5.5X / TwitterMergeSep 30, 2026
GPT-6.1 Sol promises similar performance to last week's GPT-6 release at one-fifth the token cost of Astra. Does it deliver? We re-ran our eval on how well models can guide users through multi-step problems. GPT-6.1 Sol reached 78.6% problem-solving accuracy at token prices far cheaper than Astra, Opus 5.5, or Fable 5.1. The most notable improvement was how the new model guided users through teaching interactions. Our "teaching quality metric" for GPT-6.1 Sol rose from 64.1% to 77.6%, compared to Astra's Opus 5.5X / TwitterBraintrustSep 30, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Is INSANE!Opus 5.5YouTubeTestMu AISep 30, 2026
I got Opus 5.5 to plan my first proper woodworking projectOpus 5.5YouTubeConvexSep 30, 2026
Keeping up with AI is its own full-time job In the last month, we got: • Claude Fable 5.1 • GLM 5.3 • Gemini 3.8 Flash • GPT-6 Astra • Meta Muse Spark 1.3 • Claude for Small Business In the last week, we got: • Claude Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna • Claude Sonnet 5.5 In the past 24 hours, we got: • GPT-6.1 Sol • OpenAI Dots • Muse for Small Business What'd we miss? By next week, this list will be outdated, but your workflows don't have to beOpus 5.5X / TwitterZapierSep 30, 2026
Has the Bitter Lesson Come for AI Detectors?Opus 5.5BlogValsSep 30, 2026
Cut your AI spend with AI Gateway's Auto RouterOpus 5.5BlogCloudflareSep 30, 2026
OpenAI Dots Explained: Always-On AI Agents on GPT-6 AstraOpus 5.5BlogTestMu AISep 30, 2026
Is Claude Down? Status, Fixes & FallbackOpus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustSep 30, 2026
RT @wadefoster: GPT-6.1 Sol just launched. It matches Opus 5.5 on business workflows for about a third of the price. @Zapier's Automation…Opus 5.5X / TwitterZapierSep 29, 2026
Jev AI costs less than a cent to run my benchmarkOpus 5.5YouTubeConvexSep 29, 2026
The Best 3D Render I've Ever Seen an AI Make (Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 Sol)Opus 5.5YouTubeBetter StackSep 29, 2026
Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol (Blender F1 Car Test)Opus 5.5YouTubeBetter StackSep 29, 2026
Claude vs Gemini: Opus 5.5 BenchmarksOpus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustSep 29, 2026
Cursor vs Codex (2026): Benchmarks & CostOpus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustSep 29, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5.5: Speed, Cost & SecurityOpus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustSep 29, 2026
Codex vs Claude Code (2026): BenchmarksOpus 5.5BlogNeuralTrustSep 29, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 Writes Working Code but Only Half of It Is SecureOpus 5.5BlogSemgrepSep 29, 2026
CodeRabbit joins the OpenAI MarketplaceOpus 5.5BlogCodeRabbitSep 29, 2026
Are agent harnesses dying? What harness distillation changesOpus 5.5BlogArizeSep 29, 2026
Anthropic says it fixed Claude’s writing. I ran the evals to check.Opus 5.5BlogArizeSep 29, 2026
RT @wadefoster: Sonnet 5.5 is here, less than a week after Opus 5.5. It’s cheaper and just took the top spot on our AutomationBench. At M…Opus 5.5X / TwitterZapierSep 28, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is live in Zapier! It took the top spot on AutomationBench, scoring 44.7% on Max effort vs. Opus 5.5's 40% Best for marketing, finance, and ops workflows Full scorecard with cost per task: https://t.co/tfc1e75dGxOpus 5.5X / TwitterZapierSep 28, 2026
Checking in on Opus 5.5 ~1 week after launch. It's the #1 model in share of spend and share of tokens among Anthropic models on OpenRouter Switching from Opus 5 has been particularly rapid https://t.co/K7kWAZQn21Opus 5.5X / TwitterOpenRouterSep 28, 2026
When does more reasoning stop being useful and start becoming overhead? We ran Open AI and Anthropic’s best models: GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 at every reasoning level on our new benchmark, MysteryMechanism. Thinking longer delivers accuracy gains with the same model at as much as 20x the cost. Inspecting traces, the models use their effort level in very different ways.Opus 5.5X / TwitterValsSep 28, 2026
Sonnet 5.5 beats Opus 5.5 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at half the cost. It uses far fewer tokens than previous models to do the same work, showing costs reduced up to 30% per task. It also generates output 30% faster than its predecessor, making it the fastest Sonnet model to date. https://t.co/cLW1LDMwCMOpus 5.5X / TwitterClineSep 28, 2026
RT @HKrackDev: I had Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 build the Alpine Charlet head2head... Sonnet finishes 50% faster and the quality is just as…Opus 5.5X / TwitterCodeRabbitSep 28, 2026
Anthropic's "mid-tier" model is now the second best on the Vals Index. Sonnet 5.5 debuts at #2 at just 0.47 points behind Opus 5.5, and Anthropic holds the top 4 spots. https://t.co/kumflzZBWCOpus 5.5X / TwitterValsSep 28, 2026
Shipped. At lightspeed. 🚀 Heres the latest you can do in Replit: - Build apps for @Meta Quest VR - Create Replit apps through @Muse - Link payments with @airwallex - Build with new models: GPT-Sol 6, GPT-6 Luna, Opus 5.5 - Chart data and gain insights directly through chat - For Enterprise: Request and control access within workflows More at our changelog: https://t.co/COgha3boCaOpus 5.5X / TwitterReplitSep 28, 2026
The new #1 on SWE-bench Pro costs less than the model it passed. Claude Opus 5.5 debuted at 89.9% on September 22, 9.9 points clear of Claude Fable 5, and runs $20 per million output tokens against Fable 5's $50. SWE-bench Pro is the harder cut of SWE-bench. The average across all 59 models on it is 57.6% Scores via https://t.co/sxXugN92FJ, week of Sep 28.Opus 5.5X / TwitterMergeSep 28, 2026
RT @cvaneenige: Stream in 20 seconds, using Opus 5.5 @getstream_io https://t.co/d6iPyGHMoROpus 5.5X / TwitterStreamSep 28, 2026
RT @bentlegen: Opus 5.5 product vids aren't just good because they look great they're good because they can explain the product better tha…Opus 5.5X / TwitterModemSep 28, 2026