Latency Comparison Among Serverless Databases: DynamoDB vs FaunaDB vs Upstash

The article presents a comparative analysis of the latencies of three serverless databases—DynamoDB, FaunaDB, and Upstash (Redis)—using a sample news website where each database stores 7,001 New York Times articles scored randomly. The study records database-related latency for fetching the top 10 articles from each database using AWS Lambda functions, with the latency measured between the Lambda function and the database, excluding browser-server latency. It reveals that Upstash exhibits the lowest latency (~50ms at the 99th percentile), while FaunaDB shows the highest (~900ms), attributed to its strong consistency and global replication; DynamoDB stands at ~200ms. Additionally, the cold start effect in serverless environments, notably impacting FaunaDB and Redis, influences latency, with optimizations like reusing client connections mitigating some delays. Future enhancements for Upstash include a Premium product with multi-zone replication, and ongoing discussions on forums like HackerNews have prompted modifications to the FaunaDB setup for more accurate benchmarking.

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.