Is GrowthBook open source?
Blog post from Unleash
GrowthBook and Unleash are both open-core platforms, but they differ in licensing, deployment architecture, feature-flag capabilities, and what is included without a paid license. GrowthBook’s core is MIT-licensed, while enterprise code is published in the same repository and Docker image under a commercial license; it is centered on warehouse-native experimentation and commonly relies on MongoDB, though FerretDB with PostgreSQL offers an alternative open-source stack. Unleash provides an AGPL-licensed server with Enterprise distributed separately, uses PostgreSQL directly, and focuses primarily on feature flags. The comparison argues that Unleash’s free open-source edition includes role-based access controls, server-side evaluation for frontend clients, an evaluation playground, exportable instance-wide audit logs, and built-in usage metrics for flag lifecycle management, whereas GrowthBook places several comparable capabilities behind Pro or Enterprise tiers. It also contrasts GrowthBook’s default client-side delivery of full targeting rules with Unleash’s evaluated frontend responses, and notes that self-hosted GrowthBook can send telemetry and, for licensed deployments, perform license-server checks, while Unleash can disable version and usage reporting and operate licenses offline.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edge Computing | 1 | 89 | 31 | 11 | +170% |
| Kubernetes | 1 | 4,363 | 405 | 103 | +24% |
| Platform Engineering | 1 | 1,691 | 347 | 96 | +40% |
| Secrets Management | 1 | 2,045 | 503 | 138 | -11% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.