Different Evals for Agentic AI: Methods, Metrics & Best Practices
Blog post from testRigor
Agentic AI represents a significant evolution in artificial intelligence, advancing from merely generating text to autonomously executing multi-step tasks with minimal human intervention. Unlike traditional AI models, agentic AI systems are designed to perceive their environment, form plans, take action, and self-correct, functioning as dedicated digital employees rather than sophisticated calculators. They require a distinct set of evaluation techniques due to their non-deterministic and probabilistic nature, which makes conventional software testing methods inadequate. Evaluating agentic AI involves both outcome-based and trajectory-based assessments, focusing not only on task completion but also on the decision-making process and resilience to errors. This includes using automated tools and human oversight to ensure reliability and safety, especially in high-stakes domains. The complex architecture of agentic AI systems involves key components like a reasoning engine, memory, a tool belt for interaction, and an execution loop for control. Effective testing frameworks leverage AI-assisted tools to assess these systems' external behavior, tool usage, robustness, and ability to self-correct in dynamic environments, ensuring that the agents deliver consistent business value while maintaining compliance and safety standards.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Agents | 37 | 4,874 | 1,103 | 240 | -1% |
| LLM | 25 | 5,172 | 1,006 | 220 | -43% |
| AI Guardrails | 9 | 437 | 127 | 49 | +102% |
| RAG | 8 | 885 | 228 | 95 | -58% |
| Observability | 7 | 3,430 | 674 | 183 | +0% |
| Real-time | 4 | 5,457 | 1,338 | 238 | -5% |