7 CLI Coding Agents Ranked by Real Terminal-Bench Scores
Blog post from SSOJet
Codex CLI leads the Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard with a score of 82.2% among named CLI coding agents, using GPT-5.5, as of June 2026, demonstrating superior autonomous performance in executing commands and completing tasks without human intervention. Terminal-Bench 2.0, which evaluates the capability of CLI agents to perform tasks such as running commands, reading outputs, and error recovery, confirms this ranking as the most relevant for terminal-native agents, while the overall leaderboard is topped by the research harness "vix" running Claude Opus 4.7 at 90.2%. Codex CLI, associated with ChatGPT Plus, is recognized for its verifiable benchmark score, distinct from marketing claims, and offers a competitive edge in pricing and performance. Other agents like Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, and Aider provide varying benefits, such as long unattended runs, a generous free tier, model flexibility, and git-native integrations, respectively. The evaluation emphasizes that a CLI agent's performance is a combination of the model and the harness used, suggesting that agents like OpenCode and Aider, which allow model flexibility, can reach top leaderboard scores depending on the model applied.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Coding Assistant | 6 | 2,151 | 535 | 165 | +20% |
| LLM | 2 | 6,196 | 1,155 | 243 | -32% |
| AI Agents | 1 | 6,005 | 1,359 | 264 | +22% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.