Home / Companies / Speakeasy / Blog / Post Details
Content Deep Dive

Choosing an MCP gateway: Gram vs Docker vs TrueFoundry vs Composio

Blog post from Speakeasy

Post Details
Company
Date Published
Author
Nolan Sullivan
Word Count
2,753
Language
English
Hacker News Points
-
Summary

The blog post explores the landscape of MCP (Model Context Protocol) gateways, focusing on four solutions: Gram, Composio, TrueFoundry, and Docker MCP Gateway. Each tool is tailored to different needs, such as Gram's ability to generate MCP servers from REST APIs and provide an intuitive setup, making it ideal for quickly building products. Composio offers over 500 managed integrations, excelling in chat workflows but lacking in custom server support. TrueFoundry stands out with its advanced governance and compliance features, catering to enterprises in regulated industries, although it may be overly complex for smaller teams. Docker MCP Gateway provides full infrastructure control through container orchestration, appealing to teams already embedded in Docker ecosystems, but requires significant setup and maintenance expertise. The post emphasizes selecting an MCP gateway based on the specific needs of building new servers or managing existing ones, considering factors like integration capabilities, governance controls, and setup complexity.