Home / Companies / Rollbar / Blog / Post Details
Content Deep Dive

Merging versus Custom Fingerprinting

Blog post from Rollbar

Post Details
Company
Date Published
Author
-
Word Count
828
Company Posts That Month
3
Language
English
Hacker News Points
-
Post removed?
No
Summary

Rollbar's recent introduction of manual merging provides users with multiple options for combining error occurrences into a single item, complementing their existing default fingerprinting algorithm and custom fingerprinting rules. The default algorithm generates a fingerprint by combining filenames, method names, and exception class names, but users can create custom rules using a JSON-based syntax to achieve more precise error grouping based on specific project needs. Despite the ease of use offered by the UI for manual merging, custom fingerprinting rules remain valuable for automating error combination, especially for recurring errors like OperationalErrors, as they can ensure consistent treatment of future occurrences without additional manual intervention. While manual merging allows for flexibility in organizing errors and the ability to un-merge, custom rules offer a more automated and sophisticated approach to error tracking, although they apply only to future occurrences and require familiarity with JSON syntax.

Trends Found in this Post

No tracked trend matches for this post yet.

Use This Data

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.