Benchmarking RedisGraph 1.0: Update

We recently published benchmarking results for RedisGraph and responded to criticism from TigerGraph regarding the accuracy of our findings. We initially introduced a parallel requests benchmark to better represent real-world scenarios, but incorrectly extrapolated benchmark times for TigerGraph. To correct this, we re-executed the full benchmark against TigerGraph, revealing that RedisGraph is 5-15 times faster than TigerGraph in most cases, with the biggest difference seen in one-hop queries. Our new results also show that average query times are a more accurate metric for this test, with RedisGraph's average query times being 5-20 times faster than TigerGraph under parallel load. We're making our modified benchmarking code available to everyone and documenting known issues to increase transparency and accuracy.

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.