Engineering Time is Your Most Valuable Asset: Are You Spending It Right?
Blog post from PagerDuty
Technology leaders often face the dilemma of whether to build or buy incident management systems, with the instinct to build in-house driven by engineering teams' confidence in their capabilities. However, the real consideration lies in strategic resource allocation, as building in-house involves not just development costs but ongoing maintenance, security, and integration efforts, which can divert top engineering talent from core business objectives and innovation. These hidden operational costs can lead to significant opportunity costs, delayed feature releases, and slower incident response times, particularly as organizations scale. In contrast, opting for established solutions like PagerDuty can provide strategic advantages, allowing companies to focus on their core differentiators while benefiting from advanced capabilities and operational resilience. This approach is supported by many leading technology companies, including nearly 70% of the Fortune 100, who prioritize leveraging proven incident management solutions to enhance efficiency and maintain a competitive edge.