Three Reviewers, Two Rounds, One Verdict: Build a Code Review Debate with Round Robin

Part 5 of an Agentspan multi-agent strategy series explains round robin orchestration, in which agents follow a fixed repeating order and use the complete prior conversation to refine, challenge, or support one another’s work. Agentspan is presented as a durable workflow platform for building, integrating, and observing agents, with executions that persist across failures and can be inspected through a dashboard. The example builds a code-review debate among an architect, security reviewer, and pragmatist, who complete two sequential discussion rounds before a summarizer delivers an approve, request-changes, or needs-discussion verdict. Unlike parallel reviews, which generate independent opinions simultaneously, round robin promotes convergence by letting each reviewer respond to earlier findings, such as SQL injection, path traversal, sensitive card-data logging, excessive file permissions, and potential over-engineering. The strategy is configured with `Strategy.ROUND_ROBIN` and a turn limit, can resume after interruptions from the next persisted turn, and can be combined with other patterns, such as parallel research followed by a structured debate and final summary.

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.