Nothing works first time: if you are coding, you are debugging. This used to mean console.log(), print statements scattered like breadcrumbs, and hours spent staring at stacktraces trying to decipher what went wrong and where. Now, errors are chucked into AI-powered tools like Claude to decipher in seconds rather than hours. These tools use machine learning to debug code more effectively, allowing developers to build more robust software and learn how not to make mistakes in the first place. There are three levels of AI-assisted debugging: "lazy" AI debugging, interactive debugging agents that actively explore a code's execution, and structured debugging prompts that provide context and clarify intent. Lazy prompting relies on an LLM's innate ability to understand error messages without explicit instructions, while structured prompts mimic how senior developers communicate about bugs, providing precision, context, and constraints. The future of debugging will be AI agents that actively drive a real debugger, set breakpoints, inspect variables, and patch code in an automated loop, significantly expanding the agent's "action and observation space." These agents will enable more informed decisions about code fixes and expand the capabilities of current LLM-based agents. By using these tools and techniques, developers can learn how to debug more effectively and become better engineers.