Beating Proprietary Models with a Quick Fine-Tune
Blog post from Modal
With just a handful of examples, fine-tuned open-source embedding models can provide greater accuracy at a lower price than proprietary models. Custom models matter for companies like Netflix and Spotify that use data to improve their recommendation systems. Large pre-trained models with permissive licenses have simplified the bootstrap step, allowing organizations to start with these models and expect them to perform reasonably well on their task. Fine-tuning kicks off the data flywheel by accumulating data quickly, which can lead to better performance than the off-the-shelf model. The process of fine-tuning involves design decisions such as finding or creating a dataset, choosing a base model, and acquiring training infrastructure. Running a grid search over fine-tuning hyperparameters is an effective way to explore experimental parameters, and Modal's autoscaling infrastructure can be used to scale experiments in parallel. Even with just a few hundred examples, it's possible to beat proprietary models on a simple question-answering task, and moving forward, the next step would be to operationalize this process to collect more data and iterate on the model.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vector Search | 21 | 2,722 | 279 | 102 | +43% |
| AI Model Fine-tuning | 20 | 787 | 151 | 83 | +58% |
| Serverless | 4 | 1,024 | 191 | 85 | +26% |
| RAG | 3 | 1,867 | 232 | 78 | +54% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.