Bulma vs. Tailwind CSS: Which is the better Bootstrap alternative?

Bootstrap is a widely used open-source CSS framework designed for mobile-first, responsive web development, offering a range of templates and simplifying the coding process by reducing the need for extensive custom CSS. However, newer frameworks like Bulma and Tailwind CSS are gaining traction by offering developers flexibility and speed. Bulma, built on Sass and utilizing a Flexbox system, provides modular columns and a rich color palette, allowing for easy customization without the burden of unnecessary modules, although it lacks built-in JavaScript features. Tailwind CSS, a utility-first framework, facilitates the creation of highly customized user interfaces without predefined components, emphasizing developer control over design and offering a smaller file size for faster page loads. While Bulma is appreciated for its ease of use and similarity to Bootstrap, making it suitable for quick UI development, Tailwind is favored for projects with specific aesthetic requirements, offering freedom from design constraints and ease of debugging. The choice between Bulma and Tailwind depends on the specific needs of the project, with no clear winner, akin to the debate between React and Vue.js.