How We Benchmark Deep Agents
Blog post from LangChain
Agent design challenges are compounded by the difficulty of evaluation, prompting the development of Deep Agents, an open-source, model-agnostic agent harness. The team behind Deep Agents revamped their evaluation framework, moving from smaller unit tests to comprehensive end-to-end evaluations using Harbor, an open-source framework known for powering Terminal Bench. These evaluations require an environment, instruction, and evaluation script, distinguishing them from simpler LLM evaluations. Three benchmarks—Harbor-Index, 𝜏³-bench, and ContextBench—cover various agent tasks across domains like software engineering and data analysis. The team employs practices such as running tasks multiple times to account for nondeterminism and maintaining a "lite" benchmark for rapid iteration. These benchmarks guide decision-making and iteration, exemplified by preparations for a 0.7 release of Deep Agents, where the team considers removing unnecessary components like the todo-list middleware to optimize performance.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM | 3 | 7,768 | 1,386 | 254 | +13% |
| AI Guardrails | 1 | 524 | 213 | 62 | +0% |
| Agent Evaluations | 1 | 302 | 90 | 33 | +57% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.