The article provides a comprehensive comparison between two popular web testing frameworks, Cypress and Playwright, detailing their features, advantages, and limitations. It emphasizes that the choice between them depends on specific testing requirements and project contexts. Cypress, known for its ease of installation and real-time reloading, is favored by front-end developers for its simplicity and user-friendly API, especially when testing in Chromium-based browsers. In contrast, Playwright, developed by Microsoft, offers cross-browser support, multi-language compatibility, and supports mobile testing, making it suitable for projects requiring broad compatibility across platforms. Both frameworks support parallel test execution and integration with CI/CD pipelines, but they differ in community support, with Cypress having a more established user base. The article also touches on aspects such as API testing, documentation quality, and test flakiness handling, suggesting that while Playwright offers more versatile testing capabilities, it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Cypress. Ultimately, the decision on which tool to use should align with the team's expertise and the specific needs of the project.