{unscripted} San Francisco recap: do you trust your AI agents? | Harness Blog
Blog post from Harness
At {unscripted} San Francisco 2026, panels on AI in software delivery emphasized that trust depends less on agents themselves than on governance, contextual knowledge, and guardrails calibrated to the reversibility of their actions, particularly in regulated industries such as medical devices. Speakers argued that security must be embedded directly into pull-request workflows because attackers can weaponize disclosed vulnerabilities in about a day while organizations still take roughly seven days to patch, and current AI models remain stronger at validating vulnerabilities than comprehensively finding them. Organization-wide adoption of AI coding tools is also rapidly increasing code volume and shifting the primary constraint from generation to code review, specification writing, and recovery capacity, requiring review processes and teams to scale alongside automated output. The event’s roadshow continues through several U.S. and European cities before concluding with a virtual session on September 30.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Agents | 5 | 931 | 231 | 103 | -84% |
| AI Coding Assistant | 2 | 341 | 115 | 55 | -77% |
| RAG | 1 | 101 | 30 | 23 | -91% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.