The evaluation compares two small AI models from OpenAI, o1-mini and o3-mini, on their ability to catch real-world bugs in code. The dataset consists of 210 programs with various domains and languages, each containing a realistic bug that is difficult to catch without human expertise. The results show that o3-mini outperforms o1-mini by a significant margin, catching more than three times as many bugs across different programming languages. This improvement highlights an architectural shift in the models' performance, with o3-mini leveraging structured reasoning and logic chains to detect subtle issues in concurrency and flow. The evaluation demonstrates the strengths of o3-mini in handling logical reasoning, concurrency, and intent, making it a better choice for detecting software bugs in production environments.