Call center analytics: the complete guide to metrics and KPIs
Blog post from Gladia
Call center analytics play a crucial role in bridging the gap left by traditional manual QA processes, which typically review less than 2% of calls, leading to operational blind spots such as missed compliance and coaching opportunities. Effective analytics rely heavily on transcription accuracy, with metrics like Word Error Rate (WER) and Diarization Error Rate (DER) setting the foundation for reliable data that informs QA scorecards, CRM workflows, and coaching systems. The distinction between call center and contact center analytics is important, as the former focuses on voice interactions while the latter encompasses all customer channels, affecting how data is integrated and which KPIs are prioritized. Structured transcripts are key to transforming raw call audio into actionable data, supporting a consistent analytics framework across multilingual operations. Accurate transcription ensures that errors do not propagate through systems, improving metrics such as First Call Resolution (FCR), Customer Satisfaction (CSAT), and Average Handle Time (AHT), while also optimizing cost-per-contact and agent coaching outcomes. The guide emphasizes the necessity of selecting a reliable transcription vendor and integrating real-time metrics into dashboards to enhance decision-making and operational efficiency, ultimately supporting a data-driven approach in modern contact centers.
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.