AI hallucinations, where large language models (LLMs) produce incoherent or factually inaccurate responses, can be addressed through various iterative enhancements such as improved context, targeted prompts, fine-tuning, and post-processing. To test these enhancements, four strategies are proposed: automated fact comparison, automated specific checks, manual expert review, and end-user feedback. Automated fact comparison involves comparing AI outputs to expected values, while specific checks focus on particular types of hallucinations without needing expected values. Manual expert review, though slower, ensures accuracy by validating facts, and end-user feedback, despite being imperfect, provides a useful indicator of hallucination rates. Combining these methods can enhance the detection and correction of hallucinations in both development and production environments.