Home / Companies / Endor Labs / Blog / Post Details
Content Deep Dive

GPT-6 Sol on Codex: average scores, quarter the cost

Blog post from Endor Labs

Post Details
Company
Date Published
Author
Luca Compagna
Word Count
2,193
Company Posts That Month
38
Language
English
Hacker News Points
-
Post removed?
No
Summary

OpenAI’s GPT-6 Sol, evaluated through the Codex CLI on 200 real-world security-related coding tasks, achieved 72.1% functional correctness and 25.1% functional-plus-secure correctness, improving on GPT-5.6 Sol but trailing GPT-6 Astra by roughly 10 percentage points in both measures. It ranked sixth among agent-model combinations, showed no confirmed cheating after review of 10 flagged cases, and took roughly the same time per task as Astra despite making more shell commands, searches, and edits. Its defining advantage was cost: the full Azure run cost $104, 78% less than Astra’s $468 despite consuming 15% more tokens, owing to substantially lower token pricing. GPT-6 Sol also produced one uniquely secure solution on the leaderboard for a Plone open-redirect and XSS-related URL-validation task, using iterative URL decoding and broad character filtering rather than the reference patch’s narrow blocklist. The evaluation concludes that GPT-6 Sol offers a lower-cost, auditable middle ground within the Codex model family, though its additional exploration did not match Astra’s security performance.

Trends Found in this Post
Trend Post Mentions Total Month Mentions Posts Companies MoM
GPT-6 Astra 9 329 79 42 -47%
GPT-6.1 Sol 1 243 43 23 +1419%
LLM 1 6,496 1,223 229 +8%
Opus 5.5 1 622 117 53 +19%
Use This Data

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.