Didit vs ID R&D: IDLive Face liveness or a hosted KYC API

Excluded from normalized aggregate trends after staff review: 3056 posts were attributed to March 2026; 671 shared March 14, 2026. The preceding six-month median was 13.5 posts.

Review evidence: 3,056 posts in March 2026; 671 shared March 14, 2026; preceding six-month median 13.5. Reviewed August 9, 2026.

This company's pages remain public, but its content is excluded from normalized aggregate trends. Unfiltered raw trends and advanced filtering are available to Accelerate and Lead accounts.

Didit is presented as a hosted KYC platform combining document verification, passive or active liveness, face matching, device/IP analysis, review evidence, and optional services such as AML screening, transaction monitoring, database checks, national digital IDs, crypto compliance, and KYB. Its published core KYC bundle costs $0.33 per successful check, while additional modules have separate fees; an illustrative scenario for 10,000 users and 100,000 transactions totals $7,300 excluding several optional services and fees. The comparison distinguishes Didit’s end-to-end hosted workflow from Mitek-owned ID R&D’s IDLive Face, described as a deployable facial-liveness component rather than a full KYC platform, with ID R&D pricing requiring a quote. Didit cites iBeta Level 1 and 2 presentation-attack certification, a Spanish financial sandbox project involving NFC, facial biometrics, active liveness, and SEPBLAC participation, as well as SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications, although the sandbox findings are limited to the tested environment. The material recommends validating presentation and injection attacks independently, reviewing liveness scores and warnings, testing face-search and blocklist behavior, and using a phased migration with parallel flows, import reconciliation, predefined performance thresholds, and rollback procedures.

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.