Didit vs Facia: two price lists, one full KYC flow compared

Excluded from normalized aggregate trends after staff review: 3056 posts were attributed to March 2026; 671 shared March 14, 2026. The preceding six-month median was 13.5 posts.

Review evidence: 3,056 posts in March 2026; 671 shared March 14, 2026; preceding six-month median 13.5. Reviewed August 9, 2026.

This company's pages remain public, but its content is excluded from normalized aggregate trends. Unfiltered raw trends and advanced filtering are available to Accelerate and Lead accounts.

Didit is presented as an identity-verification and compliance platform for regulated sectors such as banking, cryptocurrency, and marketplaces, offering KYC, AML screening and monitoring, transaction and wallet monitoring, Travel Rule support, KYB, fraud signals, case management, and review tools within a single customer record. Its published full KYC bundle costs $0.33 per successful check, including document verification, passive liveness, face matching, and device/IP analysis, with illustrative monthly costs of $330 at 1,000 checks and $16,500 at 50,000 checks; further modules have separately published prices. In comparison, Facia publicly lists individual pay-as-you-go rates below 1,000 checks per month but uses custom enterprise pricing above that volume, while providing document, liveness, face-match, AML, and KYB API capabilities. The material highlights Didit’s document coverage, government-database connections, digital-ID options, security certifications, Spanish government attestation claim, and reported use by more than 3,000 companies, while noting that customer outcome figures are provider-published case studies. It also outlines a phased migration from Facia through traffic pilots, workflow and webhook mapping, historical-verification imports, reconciliation, and evaluation of completion rates, costs, review time, and evidence quality.

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.