A blog post on CrowdStrike's website details a comparative analysis between CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, highlighting the superior performance of CrowdStrike in security effectiveness, operational efficiency, total cost of ownership, and ease of use. The post recounts how a major American retailer, forced to adopt Microsoft Defender due to divestiture obligations, conducted an independent test that revealed Defender's limitations, such as missing in-memory threats and requiring more infrastructure investment and management resources. The retailer concluded that CrowdStrike Falcon offered better protection and cost efficiency, leading it to continue its use of CrowdStrike's suite of security solutions. The post argues that Microsoft's frequent patches and vulnerabilities can increase cyber risk, while CrowdStrike's offerings allow for more streamlined and robust cybersecurity management. The narrative underscores the importance of a careful cybersecurity choice to minimize risks, supported by additional resources comparing CrowdStrike and Microsoft.