I've summarized the text for you: The author, who started a blog four years ago, has shifted from using Jekyll and Ruby to Nuxt.js and JavaScript, finding it more efficient and scalable, especially with serverless functionality. This shift is driven by the need for reusability of templates, faster initial render times, and better support for interactivity. The author notes that traditional static site generators come with limitations, such as relying on a single programming language, which can lead to complexity and maintenance burdens. In contrast, JavaScript-based solutions like Nuxt.js and Next.js offer a more flexible and maintainable approach, with tools like Webpack, Gulp, and npm providing additional benefits. The author also highlights the importance of hosting options, such as GitHub Pages, Amazon S3, Now, and Netlify, which cater to static site needs while offering generous free plans and minimal administrative overhead. Overall, the future of JavaScript-based static sites is promising, with new tools and services emerging that make it easier to build scalable and maintainable digital experiences.