AI agents in production environments require a balance of automated monitoring and human oversight to ensure their effectiveness, safety, and adaptability. While software tools like dashboards and alerts provide visibility, human involvement is crucial for judgment, context, and ongoing improvement, as AI models can become outdated over time. Human roles fall into monitoring, which includes setting adaptive guardrails and conducting root cause analysis, and improving, which involves remediation, updating knowledge bases, and fine-tuning models. Different types of AI agents require varying levels of oversight, with compliance and customer onboarding needing high oversight, customer support and employee assist requiring moderate oversight, and workflow automation needing light oversight. Engineering leaders should design oversight systems that allocate roles to product owners, engineers, SMEs, and data scientists, ensuring structured processes that integrate human feedback and corrections. This approach prevents gaps that could compromise trust and allows AI systems to remain aligned with business, ethical, and regulatory standards.