Home / Companies / Cast AI / Blog / Post Details
Content Deep Dive

Burstable vs. Non-Burstable: Which AWS Instance Type Is A Better Pick For Kubernetes?

Blog post from Cast AI

Post Details
Company
Date Published
Author
Augustinas Stirbis
Word Count
1,198
Company Posts That Month
11
Language
English
Hacker News Points
-
Post removed?
No
Summary

AWS offers burstable EC2 instances, which can provide cost savings for workloads with low CPU utilization and occasional bursts. However, these instances have limitations, such as sharing CPU time with other users, accumulating credits that can be used to burst above the baseline, and incurring additional costs if credits are not enough. Burstable instances are not a good option for Kubernetes workloads due to poor performance and inconsistent results, and instead, using a serverless model like AWS Lambda or a managed Kubernetes autoscaler is more cost-effective and reliable.

Trends Found in this Post
Trend Post Mentions Total Month Mentions Posts Companies MoM
Kubernetes 11 1,682 185 78 +20%
Serverless 3 757 150 63 +44%
Use This Data

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.