Home / Companies / Braintrust / Blog / Post Details
Content Deep Dive

Compare Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4

Blog post from Braintrust

Post Details
Company
Date Published
Author
Braintrust Team
Word Count
1,107
Company Posts That Month
26
Language
English
Hacker News Points
-
Post removed?
No
Summary

Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash have been added as built-in Braintrust models alongside GLM-5.2, allowing users to test them in playgrounds, prompts, scorers, and deployments without separate inference providers or API keys. In an evaluation using 327 MathTutorBench tutoring dialogs, GLM-5.2 achieved the highest teaching-quality score of 0.680, DeepSeek V4 Flash scored 0.653 while delivering the fastest first visible token at 0.57 seconds with reasoning disabled, and Kimi K3 scored 0.589 while using the fewest completion tokens at a median of 48. An example tutoring task showed GLM-5.2 correcting a student’s unsupported assumption, while DeepSeek V4 Flash reached the correct equation but initially reinforced the error and Kimi K3 retained the mistaken framing. Reasoning effort affected Kimi K3’s quality most substantially, whereas enabling reasoning also increased response latency for DeepSeek and GLM. The comparison recommends evaluating models against representative proprietary data and production needs, with GLM-5.2 positioned for quality, DeepSeek V4 Flash for speed, and Kimi K3 for lower token use; both new models can be accessed through Braintrust’s interface or gateway APIs.

Trends Found in this Post
Trend Post Mentions Total Month Mentions Posts Companies MoM
LLM 1 5,068 1,020 229 -34%
Use This Data

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.