Home / Companies / AssemblyAI / Blog / Post Details
Content Deep Dive

AssemblyAI vs. Deepgram for batch transcription: accuracy, turnaround, and pricing

Blog post from AssemblyAI

Post Details
Company
Date Published
Author
Kelsey Foster
Word Count
1,700
Company Posts That Month
8
Language
English
Hacker News Points
-
Post removed?
No
Summary

When it comes to batch transcription of pre-recorded audio, AssemblyAI's Universal-3.5 Pro model stands out for its superior accuracy in capturing critical entities like names, numbers, and domain-specific terms compared to Deepgram. This model not only offers a 37% improvement in missed entity rate for emails and significant gains for medical terms and other high-stakes tokens but also provides the fastest turnaround time among AssemblyAI's offerings, transcribing a 5-minute file in approximately 9 seconds. The pricing is straightforward at $0.21 per hour of audio, with no minimums and volume discounts, and the model supports 18 languages with the possibility of automatic fallback to Universal-2 for 99-language coverage. Migration from Deepgram to AssemblyAI is simplified to a one-parameter change, making it an appealing choice for production batch workloads where accuracy is crucial, while Deepgram remains a viable option for general conversational audio.

Trends Found in this Post

No tracked trend matches for this post yet.

Use This Data

Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.