The Supreme Court’s stance on Epic vs. Apple case: What this means for App Store monetization
Blog post from RevenueCat
The US Supreme Court's decision in the Epic Games vs. Apple case has led to changes in the iOS App Store guidelines, allowing developers to direct users to alternative payment methods outside of the App Store, although Apple will still collect a 27% commission on these transactions. This change, which emerged from the legal battle initiated by Epic Games in 2020, enables developers to include links in their apps for external purchases, subject to restrictions such as limited link placement and the prohibition of passing user information. The ruling has drawn criticism from industry figures, including Epic Games' CEO Tim Sweeney, for being anticompetitive due to the high commission rates and administrative burdens imposed on developers. Similar policy changes in South Korea and the Netherlands have faced implementation challenges, suggesting that the economic benefits of directing users to external payments are limited due to additional costs and reduced conversion rates. The court's decision has not fully resolved tensions, and ongoing legal and regulatory challenges are expected, with potential implications for future app store policies and global regulatory frameworks.