Docker volumes vs. bind mounts
Blog post from LogRocket
In Docker, data persistence can be achieved through two main mechanisms: bind mounts and volumes, each with distinct advantages and use cases. Bind mounts allow files or directories from the host machine to be mounted onto a container, offering full control over storage but posing potential security risks as they permit external processes to modify the file system. In contrast, Docker volumes are managed entirely by Docker, enabling data persistence independent of container lifecycle, and can be easily shared across multiple containers without increasing their size. Volumes are recommended for their ease of use and flexibility, as they can be managed through the Docker CLI and API, are compatible across operating systems, and can be stored on remote or cloud hosts. The tutorial highlights that while bind mounts offer integration with external processes, volumes are preferable for most data persistence needs due to their security and management benefits.