A false sense of security: Guardrails don’t prevent incidents

Most engineering teams employ runtime safety mechanisms such as feature flags, progressive rollouts, observability tools, and kill switches, with 99% of surveyed software organizations using some form of delivery guardrail. Despite this widespread adoption, incidents remain common, with 69% of teams needing to roll back or hotfix production issues weekly. Many teams ship risky changes due to pressure to deliver, especially with the accelerated pace of AI-driven development, often bypassing guardrails in favor of speed. The effectiveness of guardrails depends on their consistent and integrated use within the release workflow, rather than as optional tools. High-performing teams treat guardrails as part of their core delivery infrastructure, ensuring consistent application across all services and environments, and automating rollouts and rollbacks. The goal is to embed control and reduce variability, with operational maturity and consistency being key to closing the gap between the presence of guardrails and their effectiveness. While many teams have the necessary capabilities, they often lack coordination and enforcement, leading to a fragile safety net. The challenge is to operationalize guardrails to ensure they deliver on their promise, enabling teams to maintain production velocity without compromising safety.