7 Ways to Evaluate and Monitor LLMs
Blog post from WhyLabs
The article discusses seven techniques for evaluating and monitoring the performance of large language models (LLMs). These techniques include LLM-as-a-Judge, ML-model-as-Judge, Embedding-as-a-source, NLP metrics, Pattern recognition, End-user in-the-loop, and Human-as-a-Judge. Each technique has its pros and cons, and the choice of which one to use depends on factors such as cost, latency, setup, explainability, etc. The article also provides a comparison chart for these techniques and offers insights into how they can be used in combination to provide a more comprehensive understanding of LLM performance.
| Trend | Post Mentions | Total Month Mentions | Posts | Companies | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM | 113 | 3,001 | 352 | 143 | -18% |
| Vector Search | 19 | 1,312 | 195 | 85 | -52% |
| AI Guardrails | 6 | 118 | 47 | 22 | -31% |
| Observability | 6 | 1,046 | 231 | 92 | -25% |
| Real-time | 3 | 2,372 | 655 | 216 | -5% |
| RAG | 2 | 887 | 152 | 64 | -52% |
Use this post, company, and trend context to find content marketing opportunities, perform competitive analysis, or address product feature gaps via the Plushcap MCP server or the Plushcap API.