Next.js vs. React: The developer experience
Blog post from LogRocket
Next.js, a full-stack framework developed by Vercel, extends React's capabilities with built-in server-side rendering, static generation, and file-based routing, making it a popular choice among developers seeking a comprehensive solution for complex web applications. While React, developed by Facebook, offers a flexible and customizable JavaScript library primarily for client-side rendering and requires additional tools like React Router for routing, Next.js provides a more structured development experience with automatic optimizations such as code splitting and image optimization. The latest versions of both, React 18 and Next.js 13, introduce performance enhancements like concurrent rendering and automatic batching, with Next.js leveraging these improvements for optimized server and client rendering. Despite the steeper learning curve, Next.js facilitates better SEO through its hybrid rendering capabilities, allowing developers to mix server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), and incremental static regeneration (ISR) within a single application. While React is ideal for single-page applications requiring high interactivity, Next.js is better suited for production-ready applications with its robust server-side features and ease of integration into CI/CD pipelines. Both frameworks are backed by active communities and comprehensive documentation, offering a solid developer experience tailored to different project needs.