Model Context Protocol (MCP) has sparked a lively debate on Twitter regarding its utility versus its hype, with Harrison Chase of LangChain arguing for its potential usefulness, particularly for non-developers wanting to integrate tools with agents they don't control, and Nuno Campos of LangGraph expressing skepticism about its practical implementation and reliability. Chase highlights MCP's ability to enable tool access for agents without modifying their core logic, likening it to the versatile integrations offered by platforms like Zapier, while Campos points out the limitations and underperformance of current models, emphasizing that user expectations will continue to rise. Despite Chase's optimism about the evolving capabilities of MCP and its potential for broad applications, Campos argues that without simplifying the protocol and addressing its scalability and implementation challenges, MCP risks becoming an overlooked aspect of AI development. The discussion concludes with a call for broader community input on whether MCP will become a fleeting trend or a lasting standard in AI tools integration.