The Case Against Fine-Tuning
Blog post from Helicone
In the article "The Case Against Fine-Tuning," Justin Torre argues that while fine-tuning large language models like GPT-4 and LLaMA can enhance performance in specific scenarios, it often introduces more challenges than benefits. Fine-tuning is most advantageous in high-accuracy, specialized tasks with stable input environments, but it can reduce model flexibility, increase maintenance costs, and quickly become obsolete as base models improve. Alternatives to fine-tuning, such as prompt engineering, few-shot learning, and utilizing specialized APIs, are highlighted for their cost-effectiveness and ability to maintain model versatility. The piece suggests that developers should consider a cost-benefit analysis before fine-tuning and stay updated with advancements in base models to keep their AI applications competitive.