Code reviews are essential for maintaining software quality, but inefficiencies in the process can hinder development progress and team morale. The key to effective code reviews lies in balancing speed and accuracy, with practices such as writing concise summaries for pull requests, keeping pull requests small, and stacking related changes to facilitate parallel workstreams. Research indicates that small pull requests, ideally under 200 lines, are reviewed more thoroughly and quickly, reducing post-merge bugs. Effective code review sessions should last around 60 minutes to maintain reviewer focus, with a manageable scope to prevent context switching and bottlenecks. Leveraging tools like Graphite can streamline the review process by automating routine tasks and encouraging best practices, such as maintaining checklists and providing constructive feedback. Tracking metrics like review cycle time and reviewer workloads helps identify workflow constraints, ensuring a predictable and efficient code review cadence. Overall, fostering an environment of open dialogue and continuous learning can transform code reviews into opportunities for team growth and improved software quality.