Emily Lint's article humorously critiques common misconceptions and poor practices in code reviews, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful, collaborative feedback over superficial or harsh criticism. The piece highlights several detrimental trends, such as the "just merge it" mentality that prioritizes speed over quality, the belief that code reviews are unnecessary for senior developers, and the dismissal of minor issues as inconsequential nitpicks. Lint also warns against turning code reviews into public performances and the pitfalls of relying solely on AI-generated code without human oversight. Through a satirical lens, the article underscores the need for respectful, constructive feedback in code reviews, urging developers to engage meaningfully with their peers' work, model good practices, and leverage tools like CodeRabbit to enhance the review process.