Home / Companies / Aviator / Uncategorized / Page Details

Attention reasons | Aviator Documentation

Uncategorized page from Aviator

Page Details
Company
Word Count
141
Language
English
Contains Code
Unknown
Date Parsed
2025-12-16
Version History 1 version
2025-07-07 Current 2025-07-07 (latest)
Text

AttentionSet follows very similar rules as explained by Gerrit, and it then states the reason for attention assignment. Following reasons may be assigned for a getting attention: A code review has been assigned to you A reviewer commented on the PR authored by you A reviewer approved a PR authored by you Someone manually assigned the attention to you A required status check is failing on the PR authored by you And likewise there may be PRs associated with you but are waiting on actions from others: A PR is waiting for the reviewer’s comments A PR you reviewed is waiting on the author to take an action You manually removed attention from this PR The PR is in queue waiting to be merged Previous AttentionSet Chrome extension Next AttentionSet Slack Home Page Last updated 10 months ago Was this helpful?

Analysis

The technical content you provided seems to be a description of how an "AttentionSet" feature works, likely in the context of a code review or collaboration tool. The content is mostly descriptive and does not contain any code examples. However, there are a few minor issues and suggestions for improvement:

  1. Grammar and Clarity:

    • "Following reasons may be assigned for a getting attention:" should be corrected to "The following reasons may be assigned for getting attention:"
    • "And likewise there may be PRs associated with you but are waiting on actions from others:" could be rephrased for clarity. Consider: "Similarly, there may be PRs associated with you that are waiting for actions from others:"
  2. Consistency:

    • The list of reasons for attention and the list of reasons for waiting actions should be parallel in structure. For example, start each bullet point with a consistent verb form or structure.
  3. Formatting:

    • Consider using bullet points for the lists to improve readability. This is especially helpful in technical documentation to clearly delineate separate items.
  4. Contextual Information:

    • The section headers "Previous," "Next," and "Last updated" suggest this content is part of a larger document or webpage. Ensure these links or references are functional and relevant in the actual documentation.
  5. Technical Accuracy:

    • Without additional context, it's difficult to assess the technical accuracy of the feature description. Ensure that the reasons listed for attention and waiting actions accurately reflect the functionality of the AttentionSet feature in the specific tool or platform being described.

Overall, the content is mostly clear, but addressing these minor issues can enhance readability and clarity.

Product Messaging

No product messaging analysis available for this page.

Competitive Analysis

No competitive analysis available for this page.